@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Chisholm,Roderick}, subject = {Omniscience}, note = {II 95ff Omniscience/determinism/Gombocz: omniscience and freedom of action may be in conflict: the free-doer must be able to disappoint the forecast of the omniscient. Formal paradox: the knowledge of the omniscient shall contain at least the logical truth that the actions of the free-doer are free. Omniscience does not rule out the possibility that others are omniscient, which leads to compensation losses in the other, if this free nature should be limited. II 102 VsTheism/omniscience/Gombocz: endangered by will - variant: God limited his knowledge intentionally. >Free Will, >Knowledge, >Knowledge paradoxes. Wolfgang L. Gombocz. Maxima. In: M.David/L. Stubenberg (Hg) Philosophische Aufsätze zu Ehren von R.M. Chisholm Graz 1986}, note = { Chisholm I R. Chisholm The First Person. Theory of Reference and Intentionality, Minneapolis 1981 German Edition: Die erste Person Frankfurt 1992 Chisholm II Roderick Chisholm In Philosophische Aufsäze zu Ehren von Roderick M. Ch, Marian David/Leopold Stubenberg, Amsterdam 1986 Chisholm III Roderick M. Chisholm Theory of knowledge, Englewood Cliffs 1989 German Edition: Erkenntnistheorie Graz 2004 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=200148} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=200148} }