@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Stroud,Barry}, subject = {Exterior/interior}, note = {I 206 General/Special/skepticism/verificationism/generalization/interior/exterior/Stroud: With Descartes the special is representative and can therefore be generalized. >René Descartes. VerificationismVsGeneralization: Verificationism considers eneralization as suspicious: one should not apply statements of the system to the system itself. >Verificationism, >Self-reference, >Cirular reasoning. StroudVsCarnap: the problem interior/exterior is not the same as that of the general and special. StroudVsCarnap: the sentence that Descartes does not know whether he is sitting by the fire is not meaningless, only in connection to the skeptical presumption that it is not verifiable. >Senseless, >Verification. Problem: the verificationism could come easily in the situation to have to assume that then all of our everyday language would be useless. >Everyday language. I 211 Naturalized epistemology/QuineVsCarnap/Stroud: denies the need for an external position - so that the interior/exterior-problem is avoided. >Naturalized epistemology. I 214 QuineVsKant: no a priori "knowledge". >a priori, >a priori/Quine, >outside/inside/Carnap, >exterior/interior/Carnap.}, note = { Stroud I B. Stroud The Significance of philosophical scepticism Oxford 1984 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=203543} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=203543} }