@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024},
author = {Brandom,Robert},
subject = {Two Dogmas},
note = {I 203
Two Dogmas/Quine/Brandom: the two options - fact or relation of imagination, expression of determination as belief or definition of meaning should not be considered an exhaustive alternative by the reader of "Two Dogmas". >Reference, >Beliefs, >Meaning.
I 813
Brandom: Both the internal and external inferential relations of a concept are pragmatically and methodologically on the same level. This is the core of the meaning holism of "Two Dogmas". >Meaning holism, >Semantic holism.
I 674
Content/Two Dogmas/Brandom: content does not need to change if the center and periphery change. >Content.},
note = { Bra I R. Brandom Making it exlicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge/MA 1994 German Edition: Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000 Bra II R. Brandom Articulating reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge/MA 2001 German Edition: Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001
},
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=213574}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=213574}
}