@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Wessel, H.}, subject = {Implication}, note = {I 124 Subjunction/Wessel .: ">": statement-forming operator, refers to states of affairs. >Operators, >States of affairs. Inference (= implication)/Wessel: 2-digit predicate, relates to linguistic structures. ((s) in "p>q" we do not conclude anything, but take note that a claim exists. Consequence relationship/Wessel: = implication (no operator but predicate). >paradoxes because content can be contradictory, even if the form is valid. Conditional: (E.g. scientific statement) would be false for the same reason (because the content does not form a connection). I 175 Formal implication/Russell/Principia Mathematica(1)/Wessel: "P (x)> x Q(x)": "for all x applies" corresponding "> a1a2a3..an" - binary quantifiers. >Quantifiers, >Quantification. I 297 Conditional/Wessel: subjunction follows from conditional statement - ((s) but not vice versa.) >Conditional. 1. Whitehead, A.N. and Russel, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.}, note = { Wessel I H. Wessel Logik Berlin 1999 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=231852} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=231852} }