@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024},
author = {Wessel, H.},
subject = {Implication},
note = {I 124
Subjunction/Wessel .: ">": statement-forming operator, refers to states of affairs.
>Operators, >States of affairs.
Inference (= implication)/Wessel: 2-digit predicate, relates to linguistic structures.
((s) in "p>q" we do not conclude anything, but take note that a claim exists.
Consequence relationship/Wessel: = implication (no operator but predicate).
>paradoxes because content can be contradictory, even if the form is valid.
Conditional: (E.g. scientific statement) would be false for the same reason (because the content does not form a connection).
I 175
Formal implication/Russell/Principia Mathematica(1)/Wessel: "P (x)> x Q(x)": "for all x applies" corresponding "> a1a2a3..an" - binary quantifiers.
>Quantifiers, >Quantification.
I 297
Conditional/Wessel: subjunction follows from conditional statement - ((s) but not vice versa.)
>Conditional.
1. Whitehead, A.N. and Russel, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.},
note = { Wessel I H. Wessel Logik Berlin 1999
},
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=231852}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=231852}
}