@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Cresswell,Maxwell J.}, subject = {Consequence}, note = {I 38 Logical Consequence/Cresswell: crucial difference to the entailment: it combines forms of sentence or sentence schemes ((s) no content, not sentences). >Entailment, >Conditional, >Material conditional. It is not a question of which propositions are involved and what are the truth values of the individual sentences. Propositions, Truth value. Entailment: if all the worlds where p and q are true, are exactly those, where p is true, then that means in this particular case, that p entails p u q. >Possible worlds. That q follows from p intensionally. >Intensions. Logical consequence: but p u q is not a logical consequence of p, because there are ways to ascribe truth values to p and q that make p true, but p u q wrong. >Valuation.}, note = { Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=240221} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=240221} }