@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Wright,Crispin}, subject = {Negation}, note = {I 275/76 Negation/logic/truth/correctness/correct: if both truth and correctness are playing a role, there is a distinction (see above > Neg) between the   a) proper, strict negation: turns any true or correct sentence in a false or incorrect - another negation form:   b) negation: acts so that a true (or correct) sentence is constructed exactly then when his argument does not reach truth. >Correctness/Wright, >Truth, >Assertibility. I 276 Negation/WrightVsBoghossian: the proposal does indeed assume that ""A" is true" should be complementary to the negation of A in the latter sense.         A perfectly reasonable counterproposal is, however, that A should be rather complementary to the strict notion of the former negation.         Then, for the case that A is only correct, the valuation of ""A" is true" is also correct and the application of the truth predicate will be generally conservative. WrightVsVs: but the (DB) carpet now throws elsewhere wrinkles >Conservativity. I 88 Negation: Definition negation operator "Neg": "Neg A" is true if A is false and false in all other cases (e.g. with a lack of assertibility or Super-assertibility) >Superassertibility. Incorrect solution: then with low validity of A <> B: negation equivalence "Neg (P) is true" <> Neg ("P" is true)? WrightVs: that will not work, even with "assertible" instead of "true".}, note = { WrightCr I Crispin Wright Truth and Objectivity, Cambridge 1992 German Edition: Wahrheit und Objektivität Frankfurt 2001 WrightCr II Crispin Wright "Language-Mastery and Sorites Paradox" In Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell, Oxford 1976 WrightGH I Georg Henrik von Wright Explanation and Understanding, New York 1971 German Edition: Erklären und Verstehen Hamburg 2008 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=251169} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=251169} }