@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024},
author = {Wright,Crispin},
subject = {Nonfactualism},
note = {I 272ff
Non-Factualism/Boghossian/Wright:> if we assume nonfactualism, no discourse can be more than >Correctness, >Correctness/Wright.
(i) it is not the case that S has the truth condition that P has a truth condition.
WrightVs: this can be reformulated with disquotation into
(vi) it is not the case that it is not the case that S has the truth condition that P has a truth condition.
>Disquotation, >Tarski scheme, >Truth conditions.
But denying the truth is not inconsistent with correctness of the assertion.
>Contradictions, >Negation, >Assertibility.
But (i) is incorrect, if both truth and correctness are in the game, the matrix for the truth predicate must be non-conservative: i.e. the value of A is true in all cases, false or incorrect, except those where A has the truth value true.
>truth transfer, >conservativeness.},
note = { WrightCr I Crispin Wright Truth and Objectivity, Cambridge 1992 German Edition: Wahrheit und Objektivität Frankfurt 2001 WrightCr II Crispin Wright "Language-Mastery and Sorites Paradox" In Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell, Oxford 1976 WrightGH I Georg Henrik von Wright Explanation and Understanding, New York 1971 German Edition: Erklären und Verstehen Hamburg 2008
},
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=251724}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=251724}
}