@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Ryle,Gilbert}, subject = {Phenomenalism}, note = {I 322 ff PhenomenalismVsSubstance, Vs "higher unity" in the object -> sense-data theory. I 321ff We do not have a "pure" vocabulary of sensations. We can indicate our sensations only by mentioning ordinary objects, including people. I 322 A goalpost is permanent, while sensations are fleeting. It is a unity, while sensations are a multiplicity, so there is a tendency to say that "behind" the sensations there is a higher unity of the goalpost; important features, namely, that it is a continuing substance, a thing in itself a source of causality, an objective unity... Phenomenalism/Ryle: tries to get along without these useless secret means of theory but does not recognize the disease. RyleVsPhenomenalism: it springs from another, less laudable motive: he assumed that having a sensation is itself a determining of something, or that something is "revealed" in the sensation. >Sense data theory. It seemed to follow that we can't really observe things and therefore can't find out by observation those things that we know very well about goalposts. I 323 RyleVsPhenomenalism: The truth is that "sense objects" is a meaningless expression, so the expression "statement about sense objects" is also meaningless. >Inner objects, >Mental objects, >Objects of belief, >Objects of thought, >Mentalism. RyleVsPhenomenalism: it is false to see sensation as something to explore (Vs "sense objects"). "Indirect monitoring": sensation is not describable without reference to objects.}, note = { Ryle I G. Ryle The Concept of Mind, Chicago 1949 German Edition: Der Begriff des Geistes Stuttgart 1969 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=254593} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=254593} }