@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024},
author = {Tugendhat, E.},
subject = {Redundancy Theory},
note = {I 252
Redundancy theory / Tugendhat: there is a surplus in the expression ’p’ incomparison to the incomplete expression ’that p’ - it is this plus that the addition of ’is true’ expressed - that is not at all trivial. - It would be trivial if one presupposes that one already understands the use of assertoric sentences. - "True" can be eliminated - (Tugendhat per redundancy theory)
I 266
TugendhatVsredundancy theory: if truth is necessary for determining the meaning of a sentence (by truth conditions), then "true" should not be eliminable.
>Truth conditions, >Understanding, >Meaning.
I 315
Redundancy theory / Tugendhat: presupposes that the difference between ("it is said") "that p" and "p" is already understood.
Cf. >That-sentences, >Levels, >Description levels, >Truth.},
note = { Tu I E. Tugendhat Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976 Tu II E. Tugendhat Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992
},
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=261265}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=261265}
}