@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024},
author = {Geach,Peter},
subject = {Sentences},
note = {I 204
Sentence/name/abbreviation/substitute/proxy/Geach: e.g. if "P" and "Q" are abbreviations of sentences and "A" and "B", the respective names of these sentences, then we could have a convention, by which
"A > B"
is the name (abbreviation) of the sentence
"P > Q".
>Name of a sentence, >Level/Order, >Names, >Descriptions.
Autonymous/Carnap: the symbol ">" in "A > B", is used as a sign of itself, autonymous. - (Geach per)
>Logical constants, >Logical connectives, >Sign, >Symbol.
I 258
Conjunction/Sentence/Frege: "P u Q" is a phrase that is different from "p" and "q" individually.
Mill: ditto: otherwise "a group of horses" would be the same as "a kind of horse" - but not: E.g. "Jim is convinced and his wife is unfaithful".
Solution: "the fact that ..." is always to be split into a pair of statements.
>Facts.
I 291
Sentence/GeachVsAristotle: it is a mistake to analyze complex sentences as a combination of atomic sentences.
>Atomic sentence, >Complex, cf. >Compositionality.},
note = { Gea I P.T. Geach Logic Matters Oxford 1972
},
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=264764}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=264764}
}