@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Wessel, H.}, subject = {Sense}, note = {I 140 Def sense/Wessel: a statement is known, if the meaning of sub-expressions and the properties of the operators are known. - ((s) No Fregean distinction sense/meaning? >Sense, >Meaning, >Fregean meaning, >Fregean sense, >Reference. I 141 Sense/logic/Wessel: the statement that A and B are linked by the mind is empty and does not mean anything - we get along without the word "sense". >Logical constants, >Connectives, >Forms, >Formalization, >Formal language, >Order. I 338 Sense/meaning/Termini/Wessel: difference sense/reference: only with composite Terms. Simple terms: here the distincten is pointless: "What is meaning, what is truth?" Because simple term are predicates, not subjects. "Sense of terms": this is a meaningless question, because it is not to discover a term, only the ability of users. The meaning of a term is only operationalist: the sense is known if the meaning is known. >Operationalism. This does not apply to composite terms: here: we have compositionality, but the meaning of the parts needs not to be known. >Compositionality. Then we do not know the meaning of the composite term. E.g. Round square: there is no method for determining the meaning.}, note = { Wessel I H. Wessel Logik Berlin 1999 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=267593} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=267593} }