@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Stalnaker,Robert}, subject = {Inverted Spectra}, note = {I 222 Inverted spectra/Stalnaker: the recent discussion is about the relation between representational and qualitative content. E.g. we then have different experiences when we both look at a ripe tomato, but the tomato seems red to both of us. Representational content: the representational content is the same for both! ((s) Both have the experience red). ((s) So it is about language use) and not about a stimulus as something neutral). StalnakerVsSeparation of qualitative and representational content. >Representation. I 225 Inverted spectra/intra-personnel/language/Stalnaker: e.g. assuming Fred has reversed his spectrum over time, but his language use has adapted to it. Then the qualitative content (that stays changed) cannot be identified with the intentional content. Variant: through gradual change in small steps. Important argument: then you cannot say in the end that the whole semantics is changed abruptly. >Qualia/Stalnaker.}, note = { Stalnaker I R. Stalnaker Ways a World may be Oxford New York 2003 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=281239} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=281239} }