Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 63ff
Mean: According to Kripke, Wittgenstein is not only convinced that by no fact that affects me will it be made true ​​that I mean something, but he also believed that this concept should not be explained with reference to truth conditions, but with respect to assertibility conditions.
> Assertibility/Nagel,
>Assertibility conditions, >Kripke's Wittgenstein, >Rule following, >Meaning(Intending), >Meaning, >Nonfactualism, >Facts.
I 72ff
Def assertibility conditions: naturalistic: with reference to the sequels that are natural according to a joint human view and that do not require any further justification.
cf. >Projectability, >Induction.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.