Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 28
Denotating expression/Russell/Geach: the denotating expression is a general term after the prefix the, one, every, all, some, etc.
>Articles, >Quantifiers, >Quantification, >Demonstratives, >Index words, >Predication, >Attribution, >Sentence/Geach.
I 93f
Denotating expression/Geach: E.g.

Robinson made a lot of money by selling it

This is no sentence - "it" without antecedent is no denotating expression.
But if a word chain does not have a logical role in a particular context, it does not mean that it never has one. - E.g.

Jones has a car and Jones daughter drives it.

"has a car" is not denotating: "p and Jones' daughter drives it".
> Anaphora.
Also not: "there is a car ..." for "p" then: p and that is driven by Jones' daughter.
Wrong solution: to look for criteria for "real incidents": these can also be of the wrong kind. E.g.

"the only one who ever stole a book from Snead ..."

I 190f
Denotation of sentences/Carnap/Geach: E.g. DES(English) "red" is red, DES(French) "l'eau" is water etc. - for all x, x is true in L ⇔ DES(L) x.
Geach: this offers a definition of "true in L" in terms of "denotation in L"- if it is grammatically not a complete sentence, it is nevertheless in the logical sense.
It means roughly: "mon crayon est noir" is true in French".
Because "DES(English)"Chicago is a large city" is a complete sentence, "DES(English)" is not a relation sign. We cannot ask "what is it what it denotates," as we cannot ask, "what is it that it rains?"
>Translation, >Designation.
I 204
Denotation/naming/names of expressions/mention/use/Geach: E.g.

A. or is a junctor.

If this sentence is to be true, then only when the first word is used to denotate that of which the sentence says something.
"Or" is only a junctor (E.g. "but" is a junctor or a verb") in special contexts.
>Junctor.
Therefore "or" is not used autonym in A (it does not denotate itself).
The first word in A is no example here. It is a logical subject, so in the sentence it is no junctor, so the sentence A is wrong.
((s) With and without quotation marks that were saved here) - (s) Or can only be used as a connection, when it is mentioned, it is no longer a connection.)
>Mention, >Use, >Mention/use, >Description level, >Level/Order.
Mention/use/Geach: Is it wrong to say or is a connection? - No. - Is it wrong to say "or" is a connection? - Yes.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.