Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 37f
Object/Tugendhat: Definition hypokeimenon/Aristotle: object of predications. - Everything is an object: we are unable to verify this by comparing many objects. - We do not learn by abstraction what an "object" is.
I 86
Analytical philosophy/Tugendhat: Vsimagination: the main target of the Analytic Philosophy is the assumption of ideas.
>Imagination, >Mental states, >Mental objects, >Mentalism.
I 88
E.g. not: Who do you imagine under "Peter"? - but who do you mean by "Peter"?Objects/Tugendhat: we do not imagine them, we mean them.
>Meaning (Intending).
I 102
For that we need singular term instead of pictures.
>Singular terms, >Pictures.
I 131
Object/Tugendhat: instead of this offensive term we can also speak of "content", but too unclear.
>Content.
I 141
TugendhatVsHusserl: fails at the question of how predicates are to understand - because of his object-orientated approach.
False: the sentence would correspond to a situation.
>Edmund Husserl.
I 246
Object theory/Tugendhat: Facts are conceived as objects.
Object: using a sentence as a display or presentation of facts.
>Sentences.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.