Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 48
Laws/rules/logic/Wessel: Law = tautology, with operators.
>Tautologies, >Operators.
I 50
Rules: statements about formulas (formulas themselves do not appear as formulas, but as quotations) = equivalences.
>Formulas, >Quotes/disquotation, >Levels/order.
"Equivalence" is not an operator.
>Equivalence.
I 345/46
Law/Wessel: always logical form of implication - (x) (P (x) > Q (x) - although not all true implications are laws.
When a law has the form of an implication it cannot be a statement of the form Q (a) where a is an individual constant.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.