Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
AU Cass 4
Action/LuhmannVsAction Theory: the concept of action is not suitable, because a participant is presupposed. - But they also exist, however, without an audience.
In principle, an action can be presented as a solitary, socially non-resonant cause.
---
AU Cass 11
Action Theory: insisting on rationality - comes from Max Weber.
Action/Weber: first means and purpose must be distinguished.
>Purpose, >Purposive action.
LuhmannVsWeber: Problem: what should be excluded - is a certain action rather behavior?
Weber: more description of ideal types than of concrete reality.
Solution/today: Rational Choice Theory.
Cf. >Rational Choice.
Outside delimitation: Problem: what counts as consequences.
Internal delimitation: Solution: the actor, must ascribe the action to himself.
Problem: what counts as a motive?
>Motives.
LuhmannVsAction Theory: it does not clarify the contours of the concept of action. - It does not answer the question of how systems can be formed from actions, when the action is consolidated psychologically and biologically in the individual.
Cf. >Action systems/Luhmann,
>Action theory.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.