Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 126
Inflationism/Field: assumes facts (unlike the Deflationism) - especially facts about the use of language.
>Facts, >Semantic facts, >Inflationism, >Deflationism, >Nonfactualism.
FieldVs: what facts should that be?
Deflationism: the homophony-condition is sufficient to preclude that we do not use a language with deviating reference. - No more facts are needed.
>Reference.
II 133
Meaning/synonymy/deflationism/Field: a fully developed deflationism should not rely on inter-personal synonymy, let alone inter-personal attributable meanings. - ((s) Instead homophony and "how-I-understand-it".)
>Synonymy.
II 134
Then the truth conditions are not semantical.
>Truth conditions.
II 359
Homophony/Field: is met if there is a 1: 1 function (unique assignment).

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.