Lexicon of Arguments

 

Graeser I 120
Implication/Grice: implication follows from what is said. Implicature: implicature does not follow from what was said - at least one conversational rule is violated.
>Implication.
- - -
Grice IV 248
Conversational implicature/Grice: the contribution should be informative, appropriate, true, justified, unambiguous and clearly structured - it must be possible to replace the conversational implicature by an argument, otherwise it would be a conventional implicature.
>Information, >Communication.
IV 264
1. If it is suspected, one must assume cooperation.
2) Conversational implicature is preserved at reformulation.
3) Conversational implicature presumes knowledge of the conventional role of the expression - therefore, conversational implicature is not part of the original specification of the conventional role.
4) Truth of what is said is not necessarily truth of the conversational implicature ​​- bearer of the conversational implicature ​​is therefore the act of saying, not what is said.
5) To get behind conversational implicature means to get behind what is necessary for adoption of maintenance of the cooperation principle.
- - -
Cohen I 410
Conversational implicature/Grice: if it is not deleted, "if, then" is purely truth-functional. The assumption of non-truth-functional reasons is not transmitted here by the meaning, but by the implicature, e.g. if the government falls, there will be turmoil.
>Truth functions.
Cohen: here there is nothing stronger/Weaker.