Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
V 103f
Similarity/deception/error/internalism/Putnam: an outsider will have a different similarity concept than we have. Then we cannot be always wrong "in reality"! Just because there are no external standards. >Similarity/Putnam.
V 104f
Internalism/translation/truth/theory/reference/Putnam: metaphysically incompatible theories (e.g. close-up effect/distance effect) can be translated into one another. If it were only about abstract correspondence, incompatible theories could both be true. Internalism: internalism does not have anything against it, why not equally coherent, but incompatible conceptual schemes?
>Externalism, >Conceptual scheme.
V 106
N.B.: to pick out a correspondence between two areas, one needs an independent access to both. This has not be seen for 2,000 years.
>Theories/Putnam.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.