Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 139
Subjective/objective/Wright: Why don’t we just express all our opinions about the comic with "I find ..?" - Answer: It is useful to have the objectified form of community, because often we can quite legitimately take a common response to the comic. ((s) otherwise there would not be the comic in the form in which we know it.)
>Objectivity, >Subjectivity, >Community, >Language community.
I 139
There are terms that are too simple to argue about (> Wittgenstein, arithmetic): e.g. the content of arithmetic assertions as 57 + 65 = 122 says nothing about consensus and has no logical consequences.
There could be no standard of correctness if no consensus could be assumed on the basal level.
>Certainty.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.