Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
VI 106
Intrinsic/observer-relative/RortyVsSearle: Searle’s distinction serves no useful purpose. - Searle says: "essential" - Rorty: we ask: "essential what for?"
VI 126
Intrinsic/extrinsic: we cannot decide which description applies to the intrinsic characteristics.
>Description, >Observation language, >Observation sentence, >Attribution, >Essence, >Searle.
VI 146 f
Intrinsic/extrinsic/RortyVsSearle: one can only defend intrinsic characteristics if one can claim that knowledge of these characteristics is not identical with the knowledge on how to use the words used to describe these characteristics. >Extrinsic, >Essentialism, >Essential properties, >Language use.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.