Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Hintikka I 101
Experience/Causality/Cause/Border/Wittgenstein: all causal laws are reached through experience, therefore we cannot ascertain the cause of experience! If you give a scientific explanation, you describe an experience. >Experiences.
- - -
II 123
Causality/Wittgenstein: is actually a description of a style of investigation. For the physicist, causality stands for a way of thinking. >Physics.
- - -
IV 105
Causality/Law/Law of Nature/Tractatus/Wittgenstein: 6:32 the law of causality is not a law but the form of a law 6.321 law of causality is a generic name. E.g. as in mechanics. >Natural laws.
IV 108
6:36 If there were a law of causality, it might be: There are laws of nature but it turns out that you cannot determine this.
IV 109
6.362 What can be described, can also happen, and what is excluded by the law of causality, cannot even be described. >Description.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.