Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 93
Thinking/Nagel: thinking takes precedence over its description, because its description necessarily presupposes thinking.
>Description Levels, >Levels/Order.
- - -
Rorty VI 144ff
Rorty: NagelVsDennett: something "else, describable" I do not care. One should not replace the indescribable by something describable.
>Subjectivity/Nagel, >Subjectivity.
That would be like trying to ask Kant to recognize the thing in itself after the reception of Hegel.
>Thing in itself.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.