Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 42
Def cognitive priority: a concept is not conceivable without the other, but not the same as definitional priority - eg red* (field of view) without red is possible, but being red can be defined only by red* (field of view).
>Concepts, >Definition, >Definability, >Appearance,
>Appearance/Sellars, >Seeing, >Language use.
Kaplan: character: is the same for red and reduv. That is what is primarily of red*
>Character/Kaplan, Content/Kaplan.
Peacocke: cognitive and definitional priority do not necessarily coincide.
>Conceivability.
It may be that a concept has definitional priority over a second concept, but the second has cognitive priority over the first.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.