Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 162ff
complex/Wittgenstein, late: (self-criticism): "complex is not equal to fact" - see Terminology/Tugendhat: theory of objects: facts = subject (TugendhatVs).
I 298
Composition/Tugendhat: deeper concept: common dependency - what someone says when he claims the sentence ’p and q’ must somehow depend on what he says, if he uses the sentence ’p’, and of what he says when he used the sentence "q".
>Scorekeeping, >Communication, >Facts, >Understanding, >Statements.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.