Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 296
And/sign/mention/use/Tugendhat: "A and B": on the side of the sign, we do not have to expect the term "p and q", but the expression ’that p and that q".
This is an analogy, in fact. Moreover it is in need of a completion by a predicate.
>Logical connectives, >Levels, >Logical constants, >That-clauses, >States of affairs.
I 297
but the state of affairs that p and the st.o.a. that q are not composed - we need a more general term, that somehow contains composition, but goes beyond it.
I 297
Conjunction/Tugendhat: "and" is not connecting objects nor states of affairs - it combines nothing at all.
Cf. >Compositionality, >Complexes.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.