Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
V 23
Criteria/Searle: the adoption of criteria depends on their adequacy which makes prior knowledge necessary.
>Adequacy.
V 65ff
Criteria are measured by success.
V 205
Criteria/meaning/use/Urmson: e.g. the Ministry of Agriculture stipulated: an "extra fine variety" (judgmental) and beyond that the classes A, B, and C (descriptive). Between them there can be no derivation relation ((s) otherwise it is a circle). SearleVsUrmson: "any apple that is A is an extra fine variety" is not a definition but an analytical statement. It has a different illocutionary role than "this apple is extra fine". But that does not indicate that the proposition expressed in the second statement could not be derived from the first.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.