Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II (c) 104
Induction/ArmstrongVsMartin/VsPlace: as nominalists they can not accept an atomic higher level state, connecting the universals. >Universals, cf. >Nominalism.
- - -
Place III 107
Linguisticism/Place: Armstrong and Martin insinuate me to be too extreme.
Solution: to accept that the objects of desire and those which are joined by counterfactual conditionals, do not exist and may never exist.
Problem: that the quantification is not allowed over non-existent objects. >Objects of thought, >Intensional objects, >Objects of belief.
An intensional quantifier logic is not yet developed. ((s) Cf. >Intensional Logic/Hintikka).
II 106
Language/object/Place: "I want an apple, I do not want a sentence to be true".

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.