Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 47ff
Bivalence: Problem: Sorites.
II 53
Bivalence is still a basic feature of our scientific world. - In the liberal sense there is no problem - Frege: each general term is true or not - all terms are vague by ostension. >Sorites.
II 168
Logic, old: deals with properties - new: with relations - Quine: feels implications.
II 169
Logic, old: failed with relative terms: drawing figures/drawing circles (Carroll) - new: no problem with that: implication lies precisely in the relative term.
II 173
Existence: "all x are y" controversy: does this imply the existence of "x"? medieval logic: yes
- Modern Times: No (thus gains in symmetry and simplicity).
---
VII (e) 82
Logic/Quine: triple: propositions - classes - relations - logical terms: we only need three "ε" ("element of") - Sheffer stroke and universal quantifier.
---
VII (f) 119 ff
Class logic/Quine: emerges from quantifier logic if we bind scheme letters (predicate letters) "F" etc. - ((s) 2nd order Logic ).
---
IX 8
Logic/Quine: main task: to prove the validity of schemes - 2nd order logic: this is about the validity of the formula schemes of quantifier logic - E.g. substitutability of bi-subjunction:
"x1 ..." xn[((AB) and CA) > CB].
---
X 110
Logic/Quine: if you determine the totality of logical truths, you have established the logic.
X 110
Different logic/Quine: there is no differing procedure of taking evidence, but rejection of part of the logic as untrue.
X 111
"Everything could be different"/translation/different logic/interchanging/and/or/key position/ Gavagai/Quine: assuming a heterodox logic, in which the laws of the adjunction now apply to the conjunction, and vice versa - there is a mere change of phonetics or the designation. - ((s) If he says adjunction, he uses our conjunction.) - Quine: we force our logic on him by translating his different way of expressing himself. It is pointless to ask which one is the right conjunction. - There is also no essence of the conjunction beyond the sounds and signs and the laws for its use.
>Gavagai/Quine, >Connectives/Quine, >Schmatic Letters/Quine.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.