Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 272
Representation/mentalese/language of thought/Fodor/Rorty: in relation to Mentalese the skeptical question "how exactly are the representations of reality?" cannot be asked. - There is no gap.
>Representation.
RortyVsFodor "language of thought": epistemological discoveries would only be possible if there was a processors vocabulary between the scientific vocabulary and colloquial voc. such that discoveries of truth were made possible about things in general. The language of thought or any code cannot have an honor status, (not even for Fodor) as a mere code is no means of distinguishing the true from the false.
>Vocabulary, >Computation.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.