Lexicon of Arguments

Complaints - Corrections

Table

Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?

Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page

/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*

or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 

I XIX
SchifferVsMentalism: language-independent internal entities as objects of belief.
Solution: nominalism: Vs internal language-independent entities and Vs facts.
>Inner objects, >Mental objects, >Intensional objects, >Facts.
Then we need no extra-linguistic irreducible psychological entities. No sentential dualism (belief sets as objects).
>Dualism, >Beliefs.
Schiffer: we tentatively accept a token-token physicalism.
>Physicalism, cf. >Token-physicalism.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.