Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 118
Nominalism/Goodman: even though my system only speaks of individuals and excludes classes, it can perceive arbitrary things as an individual. The nominalistic prohibition is directed against the uncontrolled proliferation of entities on any selected individuals basis, but leaves the choice of the basis completely open. It thus allows alternative versions.
>Individuals, >Classes.
I 119
While the doctrine of physicalists: "no difference without physical difference" and the doctrine of the nominalists: "no difference without distinction of individuals", sound the same, they differ significantly.
(VsPhysicalism: physicalism only allows one basis which is not clear at all.)
>Physicalism.
---
ad III 76
Nominalism/Goodman: nominalism places great importance on the etiquette: a nominalist order. Whatever reverence one may have before classes, classes are not moved from sphere to sphere, and attributes are certainly not abstracted from some objects and injected into another.
>Attributes.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.