Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 201
Nominalism/Tugendhat: (recourse to Wittgenstein) a usage rule can only be explained by positive and negative examples.
>Rules, >Use.
Conceptualism Vs: but inter-subjective explanation is not sufficient.
>Intersubjectivity.
Explanation by examples leaves the decisive question always open.
I 204ff
Similarity/Tugendhat: a problem for nominalism-
>Similarity, >Universals, cf. >Ideas/Plato.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.