Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
III 27
Objectivity/Habermas: an assessment can be objective if it is made on the basis of a trans-subjective claim to validity which has the same meaning for any observer and addressee as for the subject itself.
>Validity claims, >Truth, >Correctness, >Truthfulness,
>Intersubjectivity.
Validity: Claims of this kind are truth and efficiency.
>Efficiency.
III 30
Objectivity/Realism: for the "realistic" approach, the world as the epitome of what is the case, is objective.
>Facts, >Facts/Wittgenstein, >World/Wittgenstein, >Tractatus.
III 31
Objectivity/Phenomenology: for the "phenomenological" approach, it is first necessary to determine the conditions under which the unity of an objective world is constituted for the members of a communication community.
>Phenomenology, >Community, >Language Community, >Objectivity, >Objectivism/Husserl.
- - -
Rorty I 417
(According to Rorty)
Habermas' thesis: scientific research is both, limited and allowed by inevitably subjective conditions.
>Subjectivity, >Science.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.