Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 22
Objectivity/knowledge/Maturana: knowledge, first personally, privately. - That allegedly transferable is only created by the listener (observer).
>Observation, >System/Maturana, >Action.
I 156
Def objectivity in parentheses/Maturana: should mean: everything that happens is brought forth by the observer in his life practise as the primary basis of experience and any explanation for this is secondary.
>Experience/Maturana, >Explanation/Maturana.
I 157
There are then as many areas of existence as there are kinds of distinction - leads to the multiverse - all verses are equally legitimate, although they are not all as pleasant.
>Domains/Maturana.
Objectivity without parentheses/MaturanaVs: demands unity and ultimately leads to reductionism - because it must define reality as a single, last valid area (independent existence).
>Reality, >World, >World/Thinking, >Existence/Maturana, >Ontology.
I 196
E.g. explanation by action, not by independent reality.
Cf. >Manifestation.
I 223
Objectivity without parentheses/Maturana: does not distinguish between illusion and perception, because it asuumes an independent reality.
>Realism, >Metaphysical realism.
That contradicts the structural determinism of living systems. - It cannot explain scientific explanations because observers ability is presupposed.
>Observation/Maturana, >Operation/Maturana.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.