Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 138
SchifferVsPhysicalism: it must be wrong, because if there are true ascriptions of belief, they cannot be shown without mentalist or intentional vocabulary.
>Beliefs/Schiffer.
I 142f
Def Ontological physicalism/Schiffer: thesis: ontological physicalism has no irreducible psychological entities.
Def Sententialist physicalism: there are no psychological sentences (which is wrong).
If there are any, the two physicalisms fall together.
Def Sententialist Dualism: there are true psychological sentences.
Belief properties: if there are any, belief propositions and Sententialist Dualism cannot be true. - Ontological Dualism/SchifferVsDescartes: is unreasonable.
Sententialist Dualism/ontological physicalism/Schiffer: because both are true, there are no belief propositions.
NominalismVsDualism/Quine: If the Sententialist Physicalism is wrong, there are no true beliefs.
>Dualism.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.