Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
275F II
Regress/evidence/ relation/Nozick: the regress that we need a proof that something is an evidence is stopped when a document has a dual benefit
a) as evidence of something
b) for the fact that it is an evidence for something.
>Evidence, >Proofs, >Provability.
In other words, that it is evidence for two contingent statements - a particular one and a more general document about the relationship.
>Contingency, >Statement.
Logical form: e.g. eRh and also e R (eRh) and it is also the case that e R [e R (eRh)] then we have no regress.
If it is the same evidence e the regress is stopped before: if eR (eRh).

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.