Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 196
StrawsonVsFrege: that the parts of the sentence stick together only by unsaturated is merely metaphorical - RamseyVsFrege: no reason to consider any part as unsaturated.
>Reference/Ramsey, >Particularization/Ramsey, >"unsaturated"/Frege.
I 214
Connection/relation/Strawson:
a) stating tie: (s) "is a .."
b) stating tie: "is in relation to ..", "is an example for.."
Two-digit terms themselves are not again designations of relations.
>Relations.
Stating relations between things are not themselves relation.
I 216
1. Kind or sample tie/Strawson:
a) Fido is a dog, an animal, a terrier
b) Fido, Coco and Rover are dogs.
2.
a) characterizing tie: E.g. Socrates is wise, is agile, argues
b) Socrates , Plato, Aristotle, are all wise, all die
3. attributive tie: Summary of particulars due to the characterizing tie. E.g. smiling, praying - each of them symmetrical form: "x stands in characterizing tie to y.
Asymmetrical: "x is characterized by y" - then y is a dependent element.
I 219
Categorical criterion of the subject-predicate distinction: "x is asserted bonded as non-relational to y" i.e. that universals can be predicted by particulars, but not particulars of universals. - But also universals can be predicated by universals.
>Universals/Strawson.
I 221
New: distinction between fact types instead of word types.
---
IV 53
Sentence/Strawson: the general form of the sentence is: "It behaves so and so".

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.