Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 50ff
NagelVs alternative conceptual schemes: There are such schemes where we cannot even get out if we look at ourselves from the outside as thinking beings. Therefore, the idea of ​​a different kind of consciousness or conceptual scheme contributes nothing to distance ourselves from such thoughts. (VsScheme)
I 51ff
DavidsonVs alternative conceptual schemes (similar to Nagel): I must capture the alien consciousness using the categories of my own.
>Other minds.
But that’s not the whole point: rather, it is the real content of certain ideas about the world, and certain forms of thought that determines the conditions of the interpretation: nothing that does not fufil these conditions could be considered thinking.
>Thinking/Nagel.
I 52
Nagel: there is no place where the perspectivist could settle.
>Perspective/Nagel.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.