Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Stegmüller VI 3ff
Skepticism/Hume/Stegmüller: "implicit" skepticism: exists only in terms of necessity. This is also shared by Wittgenstein.
"Skeptical Solution"/Hume: "the problem does not exists" or regularity and types instead particulars.
"Radical" skepticism/hyper-skepticism: there is no fact which decides what we mean, and therefore none that underlies our meaningful speech or mathematical knowledge (WittgensteinVs).
>Nonfactualism.
Wittgenstein: question: Wherin lies the fact 1. that I follow this rule, 2. that I mean something specific when using a word, 3. that I have acquired a term?
>Skepticism/Wittgenstein, >Certainty.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.