Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 36
Stronger/Weaker/Field/(s): higher order systems are stronger.
I 121
E.g. "There is a proof of ~ A > ~ MA" - stronger: "There is a model of A > MA".
I 132
Theory/nominalism/strong/weak/(s): a strong theory: has more consequences - if mathematical entities should be dispensable, a platonic theory must have no (physical) consequences, which a nominalistic (physical entities only) does not have.
>Nominalism, >Platonism.
I 172
Weaken/"too rich"/"too strong"/Field: E.g. a theory (or schema) asserts the existence of more entities (such as regions) than you ever need. - Then unsecured empirical consequences can occur. - (These are then unverifiable)
Solution: Weakening of the theory.
---
II 115
Fragment/stronger/weaker/Field/(s): weak fragment of substitutional quantification. (sQ): - without substitutional quantifiers: treating scheme characters as variables for sentences. - Then the schemata themselves are part of the language, not only their instances.
>Substitutional quantification.
II 123
Weak/Field/(s): Weaker: Scheme letters are weaker than substitutional allquantification - Modal operator: demands stronger expressions.
Ad II ~ 290
Vagueness/logic/(s): gradations: strong: certain instances of the sentence of the excluded third are wrong. - weaker: some cannot be identified.
"wrong"/strong: "has a true negation".
Field: to express assertions and denials of determinacy e.g. D-A, D-A, -D-DA, D-D-A, etc. (A is atomic) - so we have reduced the problem considerably of explaining the determinateness.
>Reduction.
II 295
S4: there are the following possibilities:
Positive limit: ~ DA u D ~ D ~ A u ~ D ~ DA.
Negative limit: ~ D ~ A u D ~ DA u ~ D ~ D ~ A
"Definitely indeterminate": D ~ DA u D ~ D ~ A -
"hopelessly indeterminate": ~ D ~ DA u ~ D ~ D ~ A
I.e. not even definite limit.
Potential indeterminacy of the first order/Field: for an agent this means that if he treats A as potentially indeterminate, then he must have degree of believe in it and its negation, which adds up to less than one.
II 361
Def Weak a priori sentence/Field: can be reasonably believed without empirical evidence. III 39
>Second order Logic.
III 39
Stronger/Weaker: weaker theories have rather non-standard models (unintend models) - a higher order systems is stronger than a 1st order system.
>Unintended models.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.