Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Avr I 57
Deception/HarmanVsGrice: we might need self-referential facts ((s) these are certainly true, because they are about themselves).
Problem: 1) why not from the start?
2) If not possible, then the whole analysis gets problematic.
Solution/Harman: the speaker intends that the hearer responds for the proper reason: recognizing the speaker’s intention.
>Speaker intention, >Paul Grice.
Schiffer/Grice: Grice wants to avoid self-referring facts.
Problem: the resulting complexity.
>Self-reference, >Facts, >Complexity.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.