Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 43/44
"Topic-neutral" (Austin): "topic-neutral" is not nomological. SearleVsTopic-Neutral: digestion needs not an additional state that would have to be described separately.
I 121
Nagel: no theory can show the necessity of the identity of pain and physical condition. SearleVsNagel: that is not necessary anyway, e.g. the gravitational theory does not show the necessity of gravitation.
>Theory/Nagel.
---
VIII 429
Frequent problem of theories: the analysis leads the object back to smaller elements which lack its decisive characteristics, then it is useless because it is inadequate. >Explanation.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.