Correction: (max 500 charact.)
The complaint will not be published.
Cresswell II 146
Belief/Prior/Cresswell: Thesis: Belief should not be considered a predicate of that-sentence - but instead believes-that should be seen as a syntactic unit that is applied directly to a sentence.
Cf. >
That-sentences , >
Predicates , >
Beliefs , >
Objects of thought , >
Objects of belief .
- - -
Prior I 6f
Belief/Prior: no adequate approach without distinction between mind state of belief and that which is believed (state/content).
>Belief state/Perry, >Mind state.
Prior: in case of false beliefs: instead of non-existing object: attribution: E.g. Othello attributes infidelity to Desdemona.
>`
Attribution , >
Predication , >
Non-existence .
PriorVsRussell: Problem: above it is abstract loyalty.
>
Abstract objects , >
Abstractness .
In case of falsity, the belief relation would then need to have an additional position (to the true fact).
>
Relation theory .
I 11
False Belief/Russell: false facts fail in truth-making.
>
Truthmakers , >
Facts .
Montague: points in the wrong direction.
>R. Montague.
PriorVs: not for a neutral observer.
>
Intentionality , >
Thinking .
I 27
Belief/Prior: belief is no relation - E.g. ...that nothing is perfect: there is no object.
>
Generality , >
Generalization .
I 53
Belief Function/Prior: E.g. X believes that ... is not identical in identical propositions: e.g.
...is a bachelor/...is an unmarried man.
although one may feel that the propositions are self-identical.
I 81
Belief/Prior: you do not have to believe rightly that you believe something.
>
about/Prior )
You can also simultaneously believe p and not-p.
You can believe something contradictory.
E.g. the fear that God will punish you for your disbelief.
>
Thinking , >
Logic .
You can find out that you did not believe what was thought you believed. - If someone believes what he says when he says that he mistakenly believes that it is raining, then this belief is not necessarily mistaken.
>
Error , >
Deception , >
Falsehood , >
Levels/order , >
Description levels .
No epistemic logic ist necessary, propositional calculus is sufficient.
>
Epistemic logic , >
Propositional calculus .