Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Rorty I 309
Concept of Truth/truth/Putnam/Rorty: the concept of truth has certain properties. Putnam: if a statement is true, then its logical consequences are also true, when two statements are true, then their conjunction is also true. If a statement is now true, then it is always true.
>Logical omniscience.
---
Putnam VI 394
Truth has to do with speaker-use (success), not with what is going on "in the head" (> verification degrees, confirmation degrees).
>Use, >Convention, >Speaker meaning, >Confirmation, >Verification, >Graduals, >Confirmation degrees.
Meaning/Putnam: meaning is also a function of the reference (not only in the head). Reference/Putnam: reference is determined by social practices and actual physical paradigms.
---
Harman II 431
Truth/Putnam: the only reason one can have to deny that truth is a property would be that one is a physicalist or phenomenalist (= reductionist) or cultural relativist.
>Physicalism, >Reductionism, >Phenomenalism, >Cultural relativism, cf. >Deflationism.
---
Horwich I 456
Truth/Putnam: if it was not a property, the truth conditions were everything you could know about them.
Putnam: then our thoughts would not be thoughts.
>Thoughts.

(Richard Rorty (1986), "Pragmatism, Davidson and Truth" in E. Lepore (Ed.) Truth and Interpretation. Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson, Oxford, pp. 333-55. Reprinted in:
Paul Horwich (Ed.) Theories of truth, Dartmouth, England USA 1994.)
---
Putnam III 96f
Truth/deconstructivism/PutnamVsDerrida: Derrida: "The concept of truth itself is inconsistent but indispensable". PutnamVs: the failure of a large number of contradictory statements is something else than a failure of the concept of truth itself.
Truth/Putnam: truth is not "what I would believe if I continue researching". Putnam: the philosophy of language got only troubled because they believed that they could clear out the normative.
>Norms/Putnam.
---
Putnam I (h) 204f
Truth/PutnamVsRorty: when some ideas "pay out", then there is the question of the nature of this accuracy.
>Truth/Rorty, cf. >Pragmatism.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.