Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 34
Science/Fraassen: thesis: it is not about declaration as such, but about new statements about observable regularities. >Regularities, >Observability.
I 39
Science/R. Boyd: thesis: the terms of a mature science typically refer. - We need realism, so the success of science does not look like a miracle.
FraassenVsBoyd: Science does not have to explain to its own success.
I 86
Unity/Science/Duhem: DuhemVs English Science: these are "broad but shallow", satisfied with a piecemeal approach (apparatus). - (Duhem per uniformity). >Duhem.
I 196
Philosophy of Science/Fraassen: has nothing to do with logic or philosophy of language. - And vice versa:
Fraassen thesis: language problems have nothing to do with the content of science and the structure of the world. >Method, >Theories.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.