Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 376
Time/space/logic/Wessel: The expression of time and space is no problem for relation predicates: "before", "next", etc.
Problem: time and space seen as subjects, where one in turn ascribes predicates: - e.g. "space is curved" - "narrows", "time slows down", etc.
>Time, >Spacetime, >Curved space.
I 376
Time/introduction/Wessel: analogous to the introduction of space termini, same problems basis: experience of the human.
>Introduction, >Experience, cf. >Time/Kant.
I 378
Time/existence/Wessel: here they are not persistent empirical objects (material objects) but changes of objects that build temporal structures. - Here the "differing temporality" of changes is important.
The changes exist at different times, but the time structure itself exists for us only when it is fixed by us. - So there is no sense to speak of the existence of a given time, but only of a space area where we observe the changes (time and space are not separated) - one can say, changes are "identically spaced".
I 378/79
Structure/existence/time/space/Wessel: the question of the existence of structures is attributed to the existence of order relations a a Rb, and the latter is defined as a function of the existence of a and b.
>Structures, >Relations.
Changes of the spatial structure cannot be verified.
>Change.
I 380
Time/time structure/Wessel: to speak of "the same time structure", it must be formed of the same objects.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.