Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
93/94
Proof/Argument/Chalmers: to argue against something, one can proceed on three levels:
1. The Unimaginability
2. The lack of recognizability (epistemic)
3. The conceptual analysis.
For the irreducibility of conscious experience, I will argue on all three levels.
>Experience, >Conceivability, >Knowledge, >Certainty, >Concepts, >Analysis/Chalmers.
This will be about an a priori version of the logical necessity with regard to primary intensions.
>Intensions.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.