Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 327
Units/unit/laws of nature/constants/natural constants/quantum mechanics/Relativity Theory/Genz: the basic units for length, mass and time appear in the natural laws of quantum mechanics and relativity theory only covertly as natural constants: c, gravitational constant G, Planck's constant h.
>Natural constants.
Together they can be converted into a length, a mass and a time and provide when not using numerical factors like 2 or 1023 the Planck units above.
Experiment/Genz: there are no experiments that come close to Planck's time or length, but close to Planck's mass, which is strangely large. It corresponds approximately to a dust particle.
Question: why are the elementary particles so much smaller than the Planck mass?
Solution: a solution is the "ongoing coupling" of quarks and gluons in the standard model. From the small value of the planck length, the coupling increases extremely slowly and only reaches the value of Planck's length that is greater with the factor 1020 that allows the existence of a bound state of quarks and gluons - the proton.
Proton/Genz: for the proton - and thus for all strong interactions - the relevant length scale is not the Planck scale, but the 1020-times length scale of quantum electrochromodynamics (QCD).
II 328
Planck mass/intuitive/Genz: its alleged giganticness damages the notion that all physical quantities should be discrete.
Density/Genz: "worse still": if we want to place the Planck mass in a Planck length we get the 1093-times density of water.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.